Townhouse laws in India have been in presence since 1963, with the most punctual apartment suite the enactment in the province of Maharashtra. Most states in India have their different enactments for condos; be that as it may, the standards whereupon these state enactments lay depend on the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, The executives and Transfer) Act, 1963. As of late, there have been endeavour to patch up the rights and commitments of condo proprietors, land engineers and different partners through the Maharashtra Housing (Regulation and Development) Act, 2012 and the Real Estate (Directing and Development) Bill, 2013, which was passed by the Indian Parliament in March 2016. This paper is partitioned into three sections. The initial segment contends that while various states have their separate state laws identifying with the exchange and organisation of apartment suites, such states follow similar standards created in the State of Maharashtra and for all purposes and purposes, there exists a normalised set of rules identifying with the exchange and organisation of townhouses. The second piece of the paper 'Diagram of Apartment Laws in India' portrays the improvement of condo laws in India including a point by point conversation of the loft possession, move and organisation law in India.

Property law in India is generally acquired from the British Common Law, with a couple of indigenous changes. The law identifying with the exchange, possession and enlistment of property might be focal or government in nature. Entry 6 of List III of Part XXIIof the Constitution of India permits both the Central Government as well as individual State Governments to enact and control the move, proprietorship and enrolment of property. This double nature of authoritative power shows itself in various state-authorized rules which manage the responsibility for lofts, pads or apartment suites. The most prompt of these state enactments were the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Advancement of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 (presently revoked by the Maharashtra Housing (Regulation and Development) Act, 2012) which accommodated the guideline of private lodging designers and the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970 which gives loft proprietorship status. Therefore, guidelines relating to loft proprietorship in the greater part of these states referenced above set out standards beginning from the Maharashtra state law. 

Subsequently, references to lawful standards legal arrangements are based on the Maharashtra state law. Where applicable and fundamental especially in situations where a State lawmaking body has made a takeoff from the arrangements of the Maharashtra State law-references have additionally been made to other state laws, especially those relevant to the metropolitan territories of Delhi, Chennai, Kolkata and Bangalore.


The Constitution of India permits the Central Government and State Governments to pass laws on different issues every once in a while. The issue of property is one such issue on which both the local and State Governments may pass laws. While there is a specific enactment on the exchange of property, which spreads privileges of ownership, possession, use and move of all immovable properties, there is no focal enactment explicitly on the possession and move of condominiums. Be that as it may, various states have passed laws identifying with the responsibility for lofts, including - Maharashtra Housing (Regulation and Development) Act, 2012, the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970, the West Bengal Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 what's more, the Delhi Apartment Ownership Act, 1986. Simultaneously, relationship bury se condo proprietors are likewise directed through the development of co-usable social orders. The Co-employable Societies Act, 1912 is the focal enactment giving a conventional diagram of the activities of the co-agents. Different states likewise have laws managing with co-agents individually like the Maharashtra Co-employable Societies Act, 1960, Pondicherry Co-usable Societies Act, 1972, Karnataka Co-employable Societies Act, 1959, Delhi Co-usable Societies Act, 1972 and so on. The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 administers explicit exchanges of immovable property as it were. Be that as it may, it doesn't thoroughly arrange the law identifying with a move of property. In particular, the Move of Property Act, 1882 alludes to changes in immoveable property made during the lifetime of the transferor (entomb Vivos) yet avoids the exchange of property to a replacement upon the demise of the landowner. While the term immovable property isn't characterised, it alludes to anything that is permanently inserted in or attached to the ground, including a loft. The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 was  created to suit the strategy of the  then British Government in India, which was to seek an institution of an independent Civil Code of India. 

Preceding 1882, the condition of laws concerning the transfer and possession of property was disorganised and fragmented. Procedural enactments at the time coordinated with the courts set up by the British, especially in the Presidency Towns of Bombay, Madras and Calcutta. These places had no particular guidelines with respect to the issues being referred to courts, which would choose matters as per equity and value. This was understood  as an approval for the application of English law, given that such standards were discovered as being suitable to Indian circumstances. Therefore, several rules relating to English property rights were moved to India as a component of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.


In India, there is no specific enactment  dealing with possession of condos and their the board. Every one of the states in India has a different enactment for overseeing this triple relationship. Most States have  a Flat Ownership Act, for example, the Maharashtra Housing (Guideline and Development) Act, 2012, the West Bengal Apartment Ownership Act, 1972, the Karnataka Ownership (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Move) Flats Act, 1972, the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, 1973, and so forth.managing development, deal, the executives of flats and particular Apartment Ownership Acts of these States like the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970 managing adaptability and mortgage ability of the pads. Certain states have only one act managing  all of these areas like the West Bengal Apartment Ownership Act, 1972, the Haryana Apartment Ownership Act, 1983, the Kerala Apartment Ownership Act, 1983, the Orissa Apartment Ownership Act, 1982, the Delhi Condo Ownership Act, 1986 and others. The Maharashtra Act is the leading example for all the states in India and the vast majority of the laws in different states is like the Maharashtra Act. The Acts may not utilise a similar language (however the greater part of them have comparable language) yet all of them when characterising a flat and a loft  owner characterise it as a property of a private nature where the owner possesses the flat and holds a rating share in the land and the normal zones and luxuries. While Section 2 of the West Bengal Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 explicitly specifies the relevance of the resolution of structures to be largely utilised for private purposes, lofts may likewise be utilised for carrying on any occupation, exchange or business or anything else that might be endorsed in the state enactment. Every one of these Acts likewise has a provision for the development of Association of Apartment Owners who can contract in its name and as per the current Rules and bye-laws.


The development and offer of pads and condos before the receiving of required endorsements or even before the initiation of development is a customary practice, yet unlawful. This is referred to as the ‘pre-dispatch stage’ or ‘delicate dispatch period’ of the venture. In this stage, the condos are sold at a far lower cost than normal, with the value differential between delicate dispatch and prepared to-move (finished) property being as much as 30%. This delicate dispatch stage principally permits the land engineer to raise starting assets for the undertakings. Except in Maharashtra and Haryana, at present, there is no guideline that oversees the act of delicate dispatch spare. Section 5(1) of the Maharashtra Housing (Regulation and Development) Act, 2012 and the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 have made such exercises unlawful. The Maharashtra enactment states that no advertiser will begin any exchange  retention deal or promotion available to be purchased of flats for another task or period of such undertaking without first enrolling the task with the Housing Regulatory Authority. This enrolment must incorporate a duplicate of the contracted designer's or sanctioned planner's proposed improvement of each period of the undertaking as verification of accommodation of the arrangement for endorsement from the nearby position under Section 4(2)(a). Section 5(2) likewise requires that the advertiser hold various pads not surpassing 10% of the all-out territory in each working of the task until the occupation declaration has been gotten corresponding to the undertaking


In post-independence India, being an essentially agrarian nation and with a solid accentuation on Gandhian standards of the town administration, concentrated on what was an urban concern – that of apartment suite enactment. With rising industrialization during the 1960s and 70s, movement of labourers to urban zones gave birth to the need to  regulate the  housing business in urban areas. In any case, considering the barely supportive of communist standpoint that India had at that point, loft proprietors as what could be compared to land-proprietors were not given clearness as far as their privileges against land designers or advertisers. Post the advancement of the Indian economy, there was an expansion in urban  migration. It was observed by the legislature that the current enactments didn't accommodate a powerful executing arm for their different legal measures, as the level buyers could just move toward shopper discussion or common court for protests of oversight or commission in regards to arrangements of such enactments. There was a further absence of transparency in the dealings of advertisers prompting data asymmetry between advertisers and level proprietors. As a response to such issues, new enactments have been instituted or are being passed by the state governments.

"This article is written by Adarsh Khuntia, you can reach out to him at"  

"Special thanks to Ms. Utkarshini Rai for editing this article."


  1. The post you have shared here contains some descriptive information regarding real estate law. I would like to thanks to the author for sharing such post. litigation lawyer miami fl.

  2. Amazing explanation of the present scenario, it is good to analyse and understand the market when exploring the real estate market or looking for a house. Thank you for sharing. HOA website

  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

  5. Thank you for putting all these strategies into a very readable place. It shows your ability and great skills. keep sharing such article in future. debt settlement minnesota

  6. I just completed the purchase of my ideal house with the assistance of real estate agents My realtor assisted me in contacting the seller of the home and determining the exact selling price. He also took care of all the paperwork and made the transaction simple for me to finish.


Post a Comment

Popular Posts